 |
|
Time
and
Date
|
:
|
3
October 2007, 11.00 am - 1.00 pm
|
|
Venue
|
:
|
Conference Room, Department of Architecture, SDE1 Level 3, School of
Design and Environment, NUS
|
|
Student's
Name
|
:
|
Li Ze
|
|
Title
of Thesis
|
:
|
Urban Development in
Changshoujie, Shanghai: An Institutional Analysis
|
|
Abstract
|
:
|
China’s economic reform since 1978 has
brought urban development into a new era along with the profound
institutional change and organizational transformation. The distinctive
spatial patterns shaped by centrally planned institutions are now giving
way to the new urban forms. At the core of China’s urban transformation
is a new development process, which is articulated through actors with
different roles, interests, and interplays as well as various rules and
regulations. The research investigates the impact of institutional
change on China’s urban development.
The gradualist economic reform had generated dynamic forces for the
rapid urban development. Urban spatial patterns evolved in the context
of dualism which was the co-existence of the outgoing planning regime
and an incoming market system. On one hand, urban development was
controlled by planning forces. A multi-centric urban structure proposed
in master plan was established preliminarily. On the other hand, urban
development began to be shaped by the land and property market
mechanisms. Introduction of the land value helped the
“capital-rationing” land use restructuring. Through this analysis, the
link between institutional change and urban development is built. The
research showed that a new path of land and property development was
reproduced and pushed by the self-reinforcing mechanisms cultivated by
the interest groups. Taking a leading role in the urban development
process, three major interest groups, namely, local governments, danweis
and developers, evolved in the dynamic institutional context. Driven by
the common development interests, a new form of pro-growth coalition was
formulated among the three interest groups. The pro-growth coalition
caused by the self-reinforcing mechanisms was fundamentally different
from the one in the US political context. I argued that the transitional
institutions of ambiguous property rights and the discretionary urban
planning had greatly contributed to hasty urban development. The
self-reinforcing mechanisms had locked-in the path of institutional
change to an inferior way. Short termism and rent-seeking behaviors
prevailed in the real estate market due to the incomplete institutional
change.
This dissertation contributes to the institutional analysis of urban
development in general and to the understanding of urban development in
transitional China in particular, by making an explicit link between the
changes in the built environment and the underlying institutional
dynamics. The theoretical framework which integrates the institutional
change, the mode of urban development and their impact on the built
environment can be applied to other research contexts. The empirical
findings on the roles and interests of the actors and their interplay
(i.e., the pro-growth coalition) on shaping urban space are an addition
to the urban development models developed on the basis of research
findings from the US cities. The focus on incomplete property rights,
discretionary urban planning and their impact on the specific mode of
Chinese urban development leads to a showcase of the role that a central
institutional mechanism plays in shaping the physical form and
underlying processes of space formation in urban China.
Keywords: urban space, urban development process, institutional
change, transitional economy, dualism, pro-growth coalition, ambiguous
property rights, discretionary urban planning.
|
|
Under
the recently established open-exam system, academic staff as well as research
students are welcome to attend the Ph.D. oral defence.
We would appreciate if you
would register your attendance with Rozita via
email by 1 October 2007. The exam
panel members and supervisors need not register (seats will be reserved for
them).
The
candidate will give a 45-minute presentation, followed by a time of Q&A
and subsequently, where necessary, a closed-door session involving only the exam
panel will take place. For the open session, please note the following
guidelines.
1. The exam panel members can ask specific questions
on the thesis as well as general questions to test the fundamentals and
knowledge relevant to the subject.
2. The candidate's supervisor(s) can be present as
observer(s) without Q&A right.
3. All other participants can ask questions
pertaining to the candidate's presentation during the Q&A session.
4. Besides time control and moderating the exam
process, the Chair of the exam panel has the right to intervene or overrule if,
in his/her judgment, a question raised is inappropriate, irrelevant or
inconsequential to the examination.
We look forward to your participation. |
|
|
|
 |